Sunday, December 02, 2012

ROLLING STONES: ARCHIVE 1978-1986

STONES21320

STONES22321

1978: Two pictures of Keef after sentencing  in a Toronto court for possession of 22 grams of heroin, following a bust in Feb 1977 that looks set to put paid to the Stones. He escaped with a year’s probation and order to give a special concert for the blind in Toronto. Pics from the Toronto Star. I wrote a major piece for the NME about the bust which you can read here: NME: The Stone with the Golden Arm.

STONES23322

1979, June: 17-year old Scott Cantrell shot himself in the head in the master bedroom of Keith Richard’s house in Lewisboro, New York, after sharing a bed with Anita Pallenberg. Some saw eerie parallels with Performance. 

According to Wikipedia: ‘The youth had been employed as a part-time groundskeeper at the estate and was involved in a sexual relationship with Pallenberg. Richards was in Paris recording with the Rolling Stones but his son was at the house when the teen killed himself. Pallenberg was arrested; however, the death was ruled a suicide in 1980, despite rumours that Pallenberg and Cantrell had been playing a game of Russian roulette. The police investigation stated that Pallenberg was not in the room or on the same floor of the house at the time the fatal shot was fired.’

STONES25324

 1983 Great pictures from the reception at the Corso Club in New York after the premiere of Hal Ashby’s film of the Stones 1981 US tour, entitled ‘Lets Spend the Night Together’. Captions: (Top) Ronnie Wood keeps complaining that his girlfriend Jo Howard won’t marry him, however often he asks her. [Left] Three generations of the Richard family [Right] Buoyant Drummer Boy: Charlie Watts is getting in the mood. [Mail on Sunday magazine]

STONES26325

Dec 20 1985: Mick Jagger flew in from the States to join the rest of the Rolling Stones in tribute to Ian Stewart, the unknown ‘Stone’ who died last week. [Daily Mail 21 December 1985]

STONES27326

Prediction is a dangerous business. This story, written by Paul Rambali and Nick Kent, was published in the Mail on Sunday (May 25th 1986). [Paul and Nick are friends of colleagues of mine, both based in Paris. This is probably their only joint by-line.

It article begins with the phone call Mick made on a dodgy line from Antigua to the Stones’ office in London on April 3rd 1986: “Tell Keith I’m not prepared to tour America or Europe this year,” he said, There was a long pause filled by the crackling. “Nor”, he added, “in the foreseeable future.”

Rambali and Kent write: ‘Every rock journalist in the world would love to be able to write a story that could boast the headline: ‘The Rolling Stones are finished’. But the truth is it won’t ever happen quite like that.

‘Stories that the Stones look like splitting have been around for years, and the end will come with a whimper not a bang. But people will look back one day and realise how much of a landmark that phone call was.’

*

SEE PREVIOUS POSTS:

KEEF LIFE

ROLLING STONES: PAST AND PRESENT

ROLLING STONES: ANDREW LOOG OLDHAM EXCLUSIVE 1977 INTERVIEW

The Stones with Andrew Loog Oldham, producer of Satisfaction, 1965.

 

On Thursday 14th April 1977, at 2:30. I went to the Chelsea home of Andrew Loog Oldham at 31 Upper Cheyney Row (off Oakley Street) and taped a long interview with him.

This came about as follows. I was working as Dick Tracy for the NME at the time and had been sent a letter by a firm of London accountants, informing us that the sale of the Immediate Records catalogue had been completed and, as a result, they were able to make royalty payouts to all Immediate artists – but were having problems finding them all. The NME was happy to help and I was on the story.

Immediate Records was, arguably the first proper indie label, established and run by Oldham. It  lasted for five years before going into liquidation.

I spoke with Pete King at NEMS and it was he who put me in touch with Oldham, who was in England for a short period; his home was now Colombia. You can read the Immediate story here:

 NME ARCHIVE:ANDREW LOOG OLDHAM.

I can’t remember what the hook for the interview was.  I know I was particularly keen to get his reactions to the New Wave/punk scene happening at the time and was genuinely keen to know more about Oldham, a key mover and shaker of the 60s.

Andrew Loog Oldham BooksAndrew Loog Oldham Stone Free

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

He has, of course, subsequently written his own story in  ‘Stoned’, 2Stoned ’ and, most recently ‘Stone Free’

I wrote the interview up for an NME  feature piece but it was never published. The original cassette tape exists but there is no full transcript. This typed article (which is missing p9) is dated 28th April 1977 – the day before my 27th birthday.

*

Andrew Loog Oldham

TEN YEARS DOWN THE ROAD

An interview

with Andrew Loog Oldham by Dick Tracy

*

‘He had a genius for getting things through the media before people really knew what media was, to get messages through without people knowing.’

- Keith Richard

 

Andrew Loog Oldham - one-time publicist for the Beatles, one-time friend and co-manager of the Rolling Stones, co-founder of Immediate records, was back in town for a short stay.

Eamonn Andrews could have a field day with Oldham’s past life. Born in London, he left school at 16, after being expelled from three boarding schools for sundry crimes including stealing gas masks and lobbing rocks through the Civil Defence Hut.

He bummed around France for a while, got busted for vagrancy and if one press story is to be believed, staged a mock kidnap in an attempt to get the story in the Sunday papers.

He tried getting into show business as a performer using off-the-wall monickers like Sandy Beach and Chancery Lane. When that failed he worked for Mary Quant and began getting into publicity work a track that led from Mark Wynter to the Beatles. He was 19.

One day a journalist from the Record Mirror persuaded him to go and see a blues band down in Richmond. The next day he became the Rolling Stones manager.

By the age of 21 he was married to Sheila Klein, daughter of a Hampstead psychoanalyst, had a son and a dog named Genius, owned a £40,000 house, many cars and was officially a millionaire.

From management he turned to producing, from producing to Immediate records, not to mention the five publishing companies and the publicity accounts for acts like the Beach Boys, Gene Pitney, the Crystals and Epstein's acts. Mama Cass once said : "And he's only 22 - can you imagine what he’ll be doing at 30."

For a time Oldham was the hip guy. He was described as ‘one of the members of the teenage Shadow Cabinet.’ He discovered Marianne Faithful and Nico.

He confessed, in print of course, that he was "scared of age," and that he used to think he was “a boy genius”; that his favourite reading was books about "rat races" or books where "some bloke fights his way to the top*

The Sunday Mirror wrote: 'Some say he is as mad as a 5-bob watch."

When Immediate and the rest of the bubble went down the pan, Oldham headed for the States. There he went into production, working for Rare Earth and producing, amongst others, the Donovan album Essence to Essence, a live Jimmy Cliff album and the Humble Pie Street Rats album about which he comments; ‘They forgot to tell me the group had broken up before they went into the studio’.

Oldham has now remarried,a Colombian actress named Esther Farfan, is a tax exile, and is trying to get into films* Tape ran out long before we got through the conversation.

It didn’t catch his stories of arriving in Los Angeles to he met by Sonny and Cher - then Caesar and Cleo -  in a beat-up sedan with the boot full of C & C albums. Nor the time he sat in on a Righteous Brothers recording session with Spector when the brothers were coming in separately as they weren't talking to each other.

We talked about the new wave and the music business and he told me he really wanted to be around when the first punk band had a big chart hit. He talked easily and never refused to answer a question.

Now read on.

*

Andrew Oldham is now 35 and we are sitting on either end of the couch in his sparsely furnished Chelsea hideaway watching colour tv with the sound down.

Not wanting to delve straight back into the memory mists, we begin by talking about his new movie called Who Killed Enoch Powell? He hands me a copy of the book on which the film is based which is penned by Arthur Wise.

Skimming the duet jacket the general plot thread is that our Enoch is blown up in a lecture hall near York.              D-notices are clamped on to prevent the news leaking out and the inquiry is turned over to the notorious Interrogator Colonel Jeffrey 'Panther’ Monckton. England is swept by a fascist uprising and the book climaxes in mass race riots during Wimbledon week.

Oldham had been quoted in the papers recently as saying that he’d been a frustrated MP “since I was 11 years old” so I asked him what interested him about politics as a career.

‘Looking at it superficially, the ones that make it, that you hear about, are still stars’.

Is that why you’re drawn to Enoch Powell ?

‘Oh yes. Even without the book. He’s a hero of that ilk. How many of them get all this nonsense done (hands me an LP of Powell’s speeches). You can’t buy it in record shops, it’s only on sale in newsagents. Great album.’

That wasn’t quite what I expected so I asked him what his political leanings are. He sighs:

‘Right. It's a question of what I was raised on and I never really saw anything that made me want to change. I can’t stand people complaining. In this country the amount of people who drive around sitting in their Rolls Royce’s and complaining. The right have all the star quality. I think they’re much more attractive performers. You see, I don’t really go much deeper than that - if they’re entertaining and good at what they do.’

Getting back to films, whatever happened to the deal between the Stones and Decca whereby they were going to finance five feature films, including one called Only Lovers Left Alive, which had teenagers turning Britain into a fascist jungle. Oldham had commented at the time:’It could have been written for the Stones.’

'Only Lovers Left Alive was a poor brother to Clockwork Orange. The population was being decreased by war and nobody knew who they were fighting. Eventually they all realise they're all being knocked off in Ireland, fighting each other just to keep the population down. It was a badly written book but one ended up trying to get a good treatment out of it but it never happened. I think we listened to too many other people's wishes. After seven months everybody got fed up trying, so it was knocked on the head. The shame of it was we couldn’t get Clockwork.

 

YARBLES! BOLSHY GREAT YARBLOCKOS TO THEE AND THINE

The word I’d heard was that you had the film rights at one stage.

‘No. When we were after them Kubrick had already got them, sometime before he finished 2001.

‘The story that Anthony Burgess told me years later was that Clockwork Orange, The Wanting Seed, Inside Mr Enderby and one other book were all written when he thought he was dying. He was told he had cancer of some description so he decided he wasn’t going to sleep his last year away. He took uppers or booze or whatever it was and, suddenly, two years had gone by and he was still there. In the meantime he’d sold everything he could lay his hands on for virtually nothing. The interesting thing is he may be successful now but he’s never written like that again.’

For the record, Burgess’ last work was part-scripting Lord Grade’s Jesus epic and he now lives in Monaco. I’d seen Burgess on the Russell Harty show a while back when he claimed that he regretted writing Clockwork Orange because it had been singled out for so much special attention. “We know a lot of people who regret their most commercial moments” he drily commented.

In his famous Rolling Stone interview, Keith Richard said: "There was a time when Mick and I really got on well with Andrew. We went through the whole Clockwork Orange thing. We went through the whole trip together. Very sort of butch number. Riding around with that mad criminal chauffeur of his.” I asked Oldham about the chauffeur.

‘That was a great guy who was hired to drive and keep people out of trouble and ended up getting us into more trouble than we got in already. He was like the boy racer of London. He had to go on to better things. I mean, you'd be standing there in the middle of a ballroom and he’d go “Don’t move. There’s five people behind you getting ready to do you”. If somebody’s put that in your head already you just say, “Let’s get out of here” and you never really found out whether it was his imagination running wild or not.’

I was curious to know why Oldham at one stage in his career insisted on having bodyguards around him. Was he paranoid?

‘I don’t think paranoia had anything to do with it. I was just attracted to that whole thing. My only remedy after seeing George Harrison in New York, when he was doing that solo tour, to straighten my head out because it was just such a disaster to watch, was to go and see a midnight showing of The Godfather. I came out three o’clock in the morning feeling much better than when I went to Madison Square Gardens’.

This sounded interesting. What in particular about the Mafia fascinates you? There was a pause.

‘I like the morality of the Mafia, or the way its presented anyway. It’s very entertaining to read and they’re very good films, a cross between love stories and morality plays. You’re always sucked in to believing that the bad guy becomes the hero. It’s a very commercial subject.’

Did he think there was any kind of parallel between the Mafia world and the music business? After all there have been rumours for years about certain record companies being under Mafia control. Did he find that it worked on a similar kind of basis?

‘I dunno. In England there’s a lot of people in the music business who are fascinated by it and who act it out but if there’s a reality in the music business it’s a lot quieter. In America you don’t hear wild stories; either someone disappears or they don’t. It’s without the theatrics. A lot of people here really take the Mafia seriously - on an image level at least.’

He denied that the whole bodyguard scene was Mafia-inspired. ‘I didn't really now much about them then’. But what about the story of you getting two heavies to beat up a producer who’d offended you or the Stones?

‘Oh yes, but that’s like juvenile fun. I can’t say I was proud of it but I did it. I can’t say that in doing it some guy actually ended up being hit or anything happened to anybody. They might have been insulted or, if they thought it was for real, they might have been terrified by a sense of fun.’ (laughs)

 

Source: Psychobabble

Do you think that the Stones 'sense of fun’ terrified anyone?

‘I don’t think terrified. They might have found it objectionable. I don't think you’ll find anywhere where anybody got physically hurt. You know, at that age everybody was still easily influenced by other things.

‘If I used to think the way to get my anger out against this guy was to hold his hands under a window and have another guy hold it over and go "If you ever write that again, you'll never write again- I wouldn't do it today.’    But you did it then? 'Yes'.

Oldham, in his Burgess-inspired sleeve notes for Rolling Stones II put: ‘If you don't have the bread, see that blind man, knock him on the head, steal his wallet, and lo and behold you have the loot. If you put in the boot, good, another one sold.’ Was that written in the spirit of juvenile fun?

'Yes, that particular thing was not planned, like “Oh, yeah, they'll really pick up on this one.” It had to be finished by 10 o'clock in the morning so you did it.'

So how much of the Rolling Stones' bad boy image was manufactured? '

‘Really not too much. I mean the way it is now with the Rolling Stones as to who the bad boy is, its still the same but for a different reason. Charlie and Bill are still the quiet ones, Keith is still the bad boy but the points of reference have changed. Now he's supposed to be a pusher whereas before...maybe he even fancied the idea of…….

MISSING PAGE 9

‘Anyway, since the time I’d left school one way or the other I was always around money so it didn’t come as a big shock. Money's really just a barometer of how well you’re doing.’

But surely it changes your outlook?

‘Not really. There was just not that much time to sit around and contemplate yer money, especially during the years there was Immediate and the Rolling Stones going at the same time - unless you dreamt about it.’

You did manage to buy a lot of cars though, including a white Lincoln convertible and a black Daimler with a built-in cocktail bar.

'Yes, coz they were easy.’

Oldham’s philosophy towards wealth was further outlined when he talked about his time with Mary Quant in the days when she had only two shops.

‘My job would range from walking model’s dogs to pouring drinks to helping Mary Quant actually do the windows. That's an example of if, at that age, you've got to work for £8 a week for somebody, I'd rather do it where the carpets are thick and they've got nice glasses. Some of it rubs off. Even if you can't take it home with you, you've had it all the way through the day.’

EPSTEIN & THE BEATLES

Oldham certainly managed to be in the right place at the right time. Take his first meeting with Brian Epstein.

‘It was on the record Love Me Do. He was at a Thank Your Lucky Stars and I was there with Mark Wynter and I found out that they didn't have anybody in London. Tony Barrow was moonlighting out of Decca doing all their written stuff but they didn't have anyone on the streets to do it. A quick shuffle and a hustle and I went back to London with that.’

Epstein impressions?

'I liked him. You couldn't knock his dedication. That was really apparent on meeting him whether it was on the Beatles or his other acts. It was very impressive. I would think I would like to have something to be that enthusiastic about.’

Epstein has often been knocked for not realising the Beatles’ full potential. Was he aware of it?

‘The potential as we knew it then yeah. Now the whole world is open and it just gets more open as you go along. Nobody had worked America. America was a place that the Shadows had covered and didn't have the Number One record they did here. Cliff Richard you'd see pictures of working on the Dick Clark caravan, but that would be about it.

‘If you were standing in the Odeon Doncaster on the Beatles’ first UK tour with Tommy Roe. I you'd been to three or four of the dates and a night in the dressing rooms, when the windows started to break because the people really wanted to get-in. When you saw the Beatles go on and nothing could follow them - then you knew what was going on.'

His personal impressions of the Beatles were vague. He claims he was too busy doing the job.

‘Once I had enough impression of what I was selling that was really fine. The way the Beatles appear to you now was roughly there but it was in the stage it was in then. McCartney was obviously very clever because he didn’t take you at face value. I should think that’s probably true now’.

What about all this guff that's going down now about the 'new wave’ bands just not comparing to the Beatles or the Stones when they were starting out. Were they good?

'Yeah, they were very good and to most people who were dealing with them in London, they were different. They were really enthusiastic. Anyway what is good? The ‘new wave’ bands can’t be that bad or they wouldn’t be getting that much press -  more press than record sales’.

ROLLING STONES

What about the first time you saw the Stones. Can you recall that moment?

‘It was just magic and there was no rhyme nor reason as to why it was magic in terms of the points of reference you had already. They were sitting on stools - at least I remember Brian was definitely sitting down. The places were not conducive to getting up and doing your thing coz only four or five people in the front could see it. The leanings were much more on the music with that following down at the Station Hotel and Eeel Pie Island. I remember having to go out halfway through because the mind was going too fast. I was really going down because this journalist Peter Jones had told me to…(long pause)

‘Magic’s the easiest word.They were doing a form of music that I was not particularly into. When we started working out what was going to be done for the first record it was down to out of everything, trying to find the catchiest tune.’

So what sort of music were you into at the time?

Burt Burns, early Bacharach, Dionne Warwick, Phil Spectoe. Dusty Springfield had gotten hold of a lot of records you couldn’t buy here like early Chuck Jackson. More like symphonic, produced R&B. Early Atlantic.

ERIC EASTON

Oldham didn’t fart about, signing the Stones up to a management contract virtually the next day. But how come Oldham co-managed them with Eric Easton, formerly a Northern mill owner.

‘Iwas running the publicity office out of  an office I was renting from him for about £4 a week, the advantage being it really looked like a business because he had a secretary who answered all the phones. Because he was an agent, an end that I knew nothing about, it seemed sensible to do it with him, which it was.’

Later they began to fall out.

‘There was a lot of upset going down with Easton but that was mainly down to an ego clash between him and me. Ridiculous things like, I would do Juke Box Jury. They would tape two shows at once and, by the time it was finished, he’d be standing outside the fucking BBC waving writs and screaming “I want  David  Jacobs to go back on television and say you’re only the co-manager.” Getting into those sort of games.’

This led to a lawsuit at which time it was revealed that the manager’s remuneration was 25% of earnings in excess of £100 a week, and 25% of the gramophone record royalties. Oldham’s earnings were frozen for a while and he was ordered to pay £5000 into a joint bank account. He will not be drawn on the subject.

‘I think he got his money and lived happily ever after. I didn't physically settle it. Allen Klein did.’

STONES28327            Original publicity still: THE GENERALIST Archive

  ALLEN KLEIN

Ah the mysterious Mr Klein, power behind ABCKO Inc. who one lawyer in the Easton case described as a ‘predator in the field of pop artists’. Oldham told Melody Maker at the time: ‘I manage the Stones and Allen Klein manages me’. So when did he and Klein first meet up?

‘1964. It was after the first American tour which was basically a disaster. Let’s put it this way - if anything went right it wasn’t due to planning on my part. I mean we got some gigs where even the promoters wouldn’t show up. Playing at these State Fairs in Texas with a swimming pool of seals in front of you, the act before being Bobby Yee in his tennis shorts. Insanity.’

‘I met Klein in London when I was trying to get a rate on a Bobby Womack tune It’s All Over Now. I’d arranged to meet the publishing guy, who also used to be Sam Cooke’s manager, and he was handled by Klein too. I showed up for breakfast and there was Alan sitting there with the guy. He’d already done his homework and knew exactly what was wrong with America and the relationship with the record company, so we were virtually talking about the same thing. Soon Mick and Keith went to meet Klein and they felt the same way as I did -  that he was alright.’

 

Oldham’s relationship with the Stones and Klein ‘deteriorated’ after a while and they went separate ways. But at one stage Oldham had been sharing a £9 a week North London flat with the band. Who was he closest to?

‘With Mick and Keith then Charlie, but with Mick and Keith on a different basis because I never stopped from the beginning on the songwriting thing. Every other hit is relatively a one-off compared with the stability of being able to write your own things.

‘Those two things fused completely naturally because at the time they started writing, the well of other people’s things that were adaptable for singles was running out. I almost think of the record of Not Fade Away as being one of their songs just by virtue of the arrangement. They were already writing then but it was album tracks or being able to hoist other people in to do singles, whether I was doing them or Cliff Richard was doing Blue Turns To Grey.’

BRIAN JONES

Were you close to Brian?

‘Not very. You have to remember that when I came into the picture with the Rolling Stones, Brian thought of himself as the manager. Then there were probably bigger musical differences between him and me, mainly based on ambition. I refused to believe they could have hits with the material they were doing in clubs.

‘There was definitely a vacuum in his life because when someone else took away the responsibility of what time they had to be there, he probably had quite a lot of spare time on his hands. He was den mother to the group. 

Do you think he resented you?

‘I figure he had to but he had enough ambition on other fronts that he was probably sensible enough to control the resentment.’

I’d read many accounts which made out that Brian was looking increasingly fragile in the period up to his death? True or False?

‘That's an exaggeration. Everyone was looking pretty worn out. As records took longer to do and at the same time everybody’s standards went up and methods of recording got more technical. it wasn't easy anymore. It actually got to be work.

‘There's a helluva difference when any act does their first two albums and they don’t have to worry about songs because they've been waiting to make a record for two or three years. Later there's a lot of stark moments looking for tunes. He was never ultra-fit though. He always had this asthma problem’.

*

As I as putting the files away I came across another sheet of paper with an earlier version of the intro. It provides an ideal ending.

Oldham and I had been chewing the fat about the ‘new’ wave’ and his last words to me as I went out the door were: “You wait until one of those bands get a hit record. That’s when things will really get interesting.”

Prophetic words indeed from a guy who, more than ten years before Malcolm McLaren and the Sex Pistols, was causing national outrage with his scruffy, obnoxious outfit the Rolling Stones. Times have changed but it seems the basic rules apply.

The scene may have now left Oldham behind but he still watches over, his eyes twinkling, as he savours the outrage potential of the new renegades.

Monday, November 26, 2012

BIRD COLLISION DEATHS: INTRO

Help for Chicago’s high fliers

A Northern Flicker, dead as a result of running into the window of a Chicago skyscraper. [Image credit: Annette Prince, Director of Chicago Collision Monitors]

A Generalist Investigation

UPDATED: 28th NOVEMBER 2012

Lots of birds die every year – most from natural causes. Lots of birds are killed by hunters, large numbers by cats. But I was unaware that, after habitat destruction, the biggest number of bird deaths are caused by plate glass and reflective windows – the full story of which follows.

As well as Window Kills, I have investigated bird deaths involved with power lines and the even more controversial subject of bird deaths caused by wind farms in subsequent posts.

Birds collide with lots of different kinds of man-made objects and below you will see some comparative figures from the US which gives annual death rates from these various causes and others. The figures differ in each case.

  The American Bird Conservancy published the chart below comparing US bird collision deaths from a number of causes. Data date with low and high estimates:

Wind turbines: 100,000 (2010) - 440,000 (2009)

Communication Towers: 2008                               4,000,000-50,000,000

Power lines: 2001  10,000,000-154,000,000

Roads/vehicles: 2005  10,700,000-380,000,000

Urban light: 2009  31,158,000

Glass: 2006 100,000,000 - 1,000,000,000

According to the Migratory Bird Mortality Fact Sheet produced by the US Fish & Wildlife Service.

‘Building window strikes may account for 96 to 976 million bird deaths each year.

Communication towers conservatively kill 4 to 5 million birds annually (probably closer to 40 to 50 million; a nationwide cumulative impacts study should help resolve this question).

Strikes at high tension transmission and distribution power lines very conservatively kill tens of thousands of birds annually. Taking into account the millions of miles of bulk transmission and distribution line in the US, and extrapolating from European studies, actual mortality could be as high as 174 million deaths annually. Electrocutions probably kill tens of thousands of birds but the problem is barely monitored.

Cars may kill 60 million birds or more each year, private and commercial aircraft far fewer

Wind turbines kill an estimated 33,000 birds annually.’

SEE ALSO: ‘Avian mortality from wind power, fossil fuel and nuclear electricity’ by Benjamin K. Sovacool (2009)

This contains the following chart, reproduced in the Wikipedia entry on the Environmental Impact of Wind Power which includes a broader range of causes of avian mortality.

Causes of avian mortality in the United States. Estimated mortality (in thousands)

Wind turbines 440

Aircraft 80

Nuclear power plants 330

Large Communications Towers (over 180', North America) 6,800

Communication towers (cellular, radio, microwave) 4,000 – 50,000

Fossil fuel power plants 14,000

Cars & trucks 50,000 – 100,000

Agriculture 67,000

Pesticide use 72,000

Building windows 97,000 – 976,000

Domestic cats 100,000

Hunting 100,000

Feral cats 110,000

Transmission Lines (conventional power plants) 175,000

 

Hawk eye

Hawkeye by Steve Jurvetson

Its worth asking why do birds collide with things. This is the subject of a fascinating paper which you can read here: ‘Scientists find bird-centric solutions to avian collisions’

'From a human perspective it appears very odd that birds so often collide with large objects as if they don't see them,' commented Professor Graham Martin from Birmingham University in the UK. He said that it is widely held that flight in birds is controlled primarily by vision, an idea captured by the phrase 'a bird is a wing guided by an eye,' but he pointed out that 'birds live in a different visual world to humans'.

       See also: ‘Why Birds Crash’ on The Naked Scientist

BIRD COLLISION DEATHS: WINDOW KILLS

flap threats

A small fraction of the tragic death of migratory birds from building collisions. (Photo: Jim Robertson). SOURCE: FLAP

This is the essence of a story in the New York Times which shocked and intrigued The Generalist.

Up to nine million birds a year are killed in Toronto by crashing into glass-fronted skyscrapers. The city, on the shore of Lake Ontario is in the path of several major bird migration routes. The glass facades reflect the sky or the surrounding trees, disorientating the birds who head for this mirage at high speed and end up maimed or dead on the pavement below.

So many birds – mainly songbirds - die in this way that volunteers from the Fatal Light Awareness Program (FLAP), founded in 1993, mount daily patrols to collect dead and injured birds in the city’s financial district. FLAP’s founder Michael Mesure once collected 500 dead birds in a single day.

 

Birds collected after colliding with buildings, Toronto 2009, by Kenneth Herdy, FLAP

Birds collected after colliding with buildings, Toronto 2009, by Kenneth Herdy, Source: FLAP

There have been developments since this story was published on Nov 11th. NYT’s reporter Ian Austen wrote that FLAP was involved in two legal cases to try and prosecute building owners using legislation to protect migratory birds. A judgment one one of them was reported on Nov 14th in The Record where you can find the complete story.

In brief, the owners of a cluster of high-rise towers, considered the deadliest building complex in the city for bird strikes, were defending themselves against three charges brought under two piece of animal protection legislation  in a test case. The judge dismissed the case but the two-year legal battle ironically achieved one of its main objectives. When hearing began in 2011, the building owners began working with FLAP to try and deal with the problem by retrofitting the towers with ‘an outer-layer film designed to steer birds away’ . They also ‘established “bird action stations” to assist FLAP volunteers in their efforts to collect and tag bird strike victims,’ As a result of the film, FLAP reports that deaths had dropped to 200 or so in 2011. [Incidentally, The Record reports that Mesure’s estimate of bird deaths in Toronto as one million a year – still a lot of birds.]

*

image

Photo by Carl Vomberg of 206 birds collected at 49 sites in Manhattan (2th April-24th Nov 2002), a fraction of the birds killed in the borough during that period. Source: Window Pain - David Sibley (Birders World Dec 2008)

Find out what is happening in Chicago with the Chicago Bird Collision Monitors who, since 2003 have been working with others to persuade building owners to voluntarily reduce lighting during the spring and fall bird migration seasons.

A detailed account of their activities is carried in an excellent article in Audubon magazine  - ‘Pain In The Glass by Julie Leibach   - which raises some very interesting issues:

  • Most people simply aren’t aware of the problem:

‘ Birds that hit buildings at night or during the early morning hours often go unseen, scavenged from the ground by resident predators lurking nearby such as gulls and crows, swept up by sanitation crews, or power-washed out of sight.’

  • Sustainable buildings

‘a growing trend toward environmentally responsible building holds promise, as bird advocates, conservationists, and architects tout what they consider a vital sustainable design concept: bird safety—which, in a cruel twist, could be undermined by a building’s other environmental attributes, such as rooftop gardens and energy-efficient windows with reflective coatings. “[Architects and their clients] can use all the recycled material they want, they can save all the energy they want,” says Daniel Klem Jr., an ornithologist who has devoted his career to studying bird collisions. “But if their building is still killing birds, it’s not green to me.”

 

More information at Birds and Buildings  who advise: ‘If your creating “visual noise” on or around a window, be sure that the openings are no larger than a handprint.’

*

cardinal

A Northern Cardinal and the reflection that killed it. Source: Birds and Windows

One of the world’s experts on this largely unrecognised problem is Prof Daniel Klem Jr, an ornithologist at Muhlenberg College in Pennsylvania, who has been studying the issue for many years. According to a 2004 interview plate glass, reflective or not, is the biggest killer of birds after habitat destruction. Suburban buildings are as much of a problem as skyscrapers. Klem estimates that collisions with glass kill an estimated 98 million to 976 million birds a year in the US alone.

According to his 1990 paper BIRD INJURIES, CAUSE OF DEATH, AND RECUPERATION FROM COLLISIONS WITH WINDOWS this represents  0.5 to 5.0% of the 20 billion birds estimated to compose the continental U.S. bird population after the breeding season each year. By comparison, approximately 3.5 million (2.0%) bird fatalities are due to pollution and poisoning, 57 million (29.2%) result from road collisions and 120.5 million (61.5%) from hunting. He writes: ‘I suspect that additional study will reveal glass panes to exact the highest toll of any human-related avian mortality.’

‘My experimental results have revealed varied and effective methods of preventing bird strikes….Glass panes must be completely covered if collisions are to be eliminated. Covering windows with netting is most effective when cost and aesthetic appearance are acceptable. Alternatively, glass panes must be transformed into obstacles that birds can recognize and avoid… windows must be uniformly covered with objects on or near the glass surface and separated by 5 to 10 cm. I found 2.5 cm cloth strips oriented vertically and separated by 10 cm [to be most effective]….For new or remodelled buildings, architects and designers are encouraged to install windows at an angle such that the pane reflects the ground instead of the surrounding habitat and sky…Single objects such as falcon silhouettes or owl decals, large eye patterns, various other pattern designs, and decoys did not reduce strike rates… they fail to prevent most strikes because they cover only part of the glass and are not applied in sufficient numbers to alert the birds to the glass barrier. Glass surfaces must be uniformly covered with objects or patterns, separated by 5 to 10 cm, to effectively prevent bird strikes at windows.’

See also: Make Your Windows Safer for Birds [Cornell Lab of Ornithology] and The Bird Screen Company

*

Reflections in a glass office building confuse birds and can be fatal. Photo by Microsoft

Composite photo of birds killed at buildings in Baltimore, by Daniel Lebbin, ABC. This photo come from the site of the American Bird Conservancy.

BIRD COLLISION DEATHS: POWER LINES

http://www.birdlife.org/community/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/powerlinesbird-MME-Hungary.jpg

Source: Birdlife (c) MME/ BirdLife Hungary, accompanying an article concerning the Budapest Declaration on bird protection and power lines. Adopted by the Conference “Power lines and bird mortality in Europe” (Budapest, Hungary, 13 April, 2011)  

 

In November 2011, two reports - The Review of the Conflict Between Migratory Birds and Electricity Power Grids in the African-Eurasian Region and the Guidelines on How to Avoid or Mitigate the Impact of Electricity Power Grids on Migratory Birds in the African-Eurasian Region were reviewed at a UN wildlife conference in Norway. These were some of their findings:

Power lines constitute one of the major causes of unnatural death for birds both through electrocution and fatal collisions. At end of 2010 there were 70.5 million kilometers of power lines throughout the world, constructed with minimal consideration of their environmental impact. This is expected to increase to 76.2 million kilometers by the end of 2015.

The review shows that in the African-Eurasian region alone, hundreds of thousands of birds die annually from electrocution and tens of millions of birds from collision with power lines. In general, large birds seem to be more affected.

For some large, slow reproducing bird species which migrate across this region, such as pelicans, storks, flamingos, birds of prey, cranes, bustards and owls, the death toll could possibly lead to population declines or local or regional extinction.

A Blue Crane killed after colliding with electricity power grid

In South Africa, for example, 12% of Blue Cranes, South Africa's national bird, and 11-15% of Ludwig's Bustards are dying annually in collisions with a growing number of power lines.

According to the review, hotspots for electrocution are especially found in open habitats lacking natural perches or nesting trees for the birds, such as steppes, deserts and wetlands.

"The international guidelines present a number of appropriate legislative and policy actions and some creative technical measures on how to mitigate and reduce the vast number of unnatural bird mortalities caused by electricity power grids," said CMS Executive Secretary Elizabeth Maruma Mrema.

While the scope of the study was to review the situation across Europe, parts of Asia, the Middle East and Africa, the measures highlighted in the guidelines can be applied globally.

In northern Europe, for example, all low and medium voltage distribution lines have been placed underground in the Netherlands and similar measures are also being carried out in parts of Belgium, the United Kingdom, Denmark, Germany and Norway.

"Our experience from Norway is that there are various measures that can reduce the risks of collision and electrocution, such as the use of underground cables, removal of the top line and route selection, and that they are working," said Erik Solheim, Minister of the Environment and International Development of Norway.

Other less expensive measures include the insulation of dangerous electric parts of the lines, the installation of bird-friendly perching and nesting devices as well as the installation of markers or bird flight diverters in overhead wires.

The relative lack of electrical infrastructure across the African continent to date provides an opportunity to avoid the mistakes made elsewhere when new infrastructure is constructed.’

Source: UNEP news centre

*

Source: Green Guide Spain

The Spanish imperial eagle (Aquila adalberti) is a long-lived resident tree-nesting raptor endemic of the Iberian Peninsula. With an estimated population of 250 pairs (National Working Group, unpublished data 2008), it has been considered one of the most endangered raptors in the world

Electrocution on power lines has been reported to be the main known cause of death for the species, accounting for 60% of mortality cases with a strong sex-biased distribution towards female birds.

In late 80's and early 90's, several studies highlighted the risk of electrocution to population persistence of the Spanish imperial eagle  and mitigation measures were instigated accordingly. As a consequence, electrocution rates have changed from accounting for nearly 60% of total mortality events to 39.87%.   

the reduction in electrocution fatalities has been accompanied by a general increase in the population, and demonstrates that at least some large scale conservation problems can be resolved. However, the question remains as to the total cost of fixing the problem, and whether that cost is affordable.

Conservation and the preservation of biodiversity require financial investment from both the public and private sector budget. In our case, nearly €2.6 million have been spent on mitigation of bird electrocution during 1992–2009, which equals an investment of €154,352.94 per year. The Spanish imperial eagle population in Andalucía has increased from 31 to 60 pairs in the same period. Taking into account the high budgets assigned to the construction of new power lines and alternative power sources (e.g. wind farms, solar panel arrays), our results demonstrate that solving bird electrocution is an affordable problem if political interest is shown and financial investment is made.’

Extracts from: Solving Man-Induced Large-Scale Conservation Problems: The Spanish Imperial Eagle and Power Lines by Lopez-Lopez et al. (2011) Source: www.plosone.org

 

Death by electrocution is the primary cause of death of the Bonelli’s Eagle (Aquila fasciata). (Credit: Universidad de Barcelona)

A study published in the American Journal of Wildlife Management  in 2010 was produced by the University of Barcelona's Conservation Biology Group, directed by Joan Real of the Department of Animal Biology. It focused on preventing bird electrocution through the identification and correction of high-risk pylons.

‘In Catalonia, electrocution is the primary cause of death of the Bonelli's Eagle (Aquila fasciata), and across the rest of the Iberian Peninsula it affects particularly large numbers of the endangered Iberian Imperial Eagle (Aquila adalberti) and many other ecologically valuable species.

‘Electrocution occurs when a bird comes into contact with two wires or when it perches on a conductive pylon (for example, a metal structure) and comes into simultaneous contact with a wire. In Catalonia, there are more than 1000 different models of electricity pylons, which pose different levels of threat to birds.’

According to Joan Real, applying correction measures "to only 6% of the most dangerous pylons could reduce bird mortality by up to 70%."

Source: Science Daily

*

The golden eagle is one of five "Birds of Prey" now depicted on U.S. postage stamps (2012). Source: Outdoors blog

‘The birds that are most affected by unshielded electrical equipment are raptors such as eagles and hawks, and these raptors tend to seek high perches on which to sit and survey the scene, searching for prey.‘

‘The data are scattered, incomplete, and in some cases old, but one study published in 1995 is suggestive: in a survey of some 4,300 cases of eagle mortality around the United States from 1960 to 1990, electrocution was the second most common cause of death, after accidental trauma and far ahead of gunshot or poisoning. Golden eagles were more susceptible than bald eagles to electrocution, precisely because they favor treeless habitats in which power lines provide the only perches.

Similar conditions obtain in the steppes and deserts of Russia, Central Asia, China, and Africa. The documentation from such places is even scarcer, but a recent German study of a nature reserve on Lake Tengiz, in Kazakhstan, reports that ‘numerous birds, including 200 Kestrels, 48 Steppe Eagles, two Spanish Imperial Eagles, one White-tailed Eagle and one Black Vulture were recorded killed by electrocution along an eleven-kilometer medium voltage overhead power line for the month of October 2000 only.’

Source: ‘Bird on a Wire: The Electrocution of Wild Birds’ by Gregory McNamee on www.advocacy.britannica.com

*

Eagles nest on power poles

Eagles and power poles

Two solutions developed by conservationist Morian Nelson to protect eagles from electrocution in the US. See full story here: One More Hero by Allan Gates.

BIRD COLLISION DEATHS: WIND FARMS

UPDATED: November 27th 2012

Bird deaths caused by wind farms is a very controversial subject which one must tread carefully in reporting. There’s a lot of loose talk out there and many vested interests. The Generalist hope this post will provide a useful and independent view. I am broadly enthusiastic about wind energy development. Greater public awareness of this issue should help to ensure that known solutions to bird collision death problems are properly addressed. The industry can help themselves by being more open about the problem and about what they are doing about it.

Wind energy is the fastest growing source of power worldwide according to the World Bank. China plans a 60% increase in the next three years and the US a six-fold jump by 2030. The EU aims to produce 20% of its energy through renewables by 2020 - much it this from wind. Will this huge expansion of wind farms have a serious impact on bird life?

map1

map02

map3

These three maps make this global expansion easier to visualise. The data is from 2009.  (Top): Existing wind farms (Centre): Wind farms under construction; (Bottom) Wind farms planned for future development. Data from 2009. Source: www.greenchipstocks.com

F1.large

Migratory flyways of wild bird populations. A world map with the main general migratory flyways of wild bird populations is shown (adapted from information collected and analyzed by Wetlands International). Source: Science/21st April 2006  [ignore the dots]

 

This map illustrates the four major migration flyways of North America; developers are hard-pressed to site wind projects in areas with little effect on birds.

Courtesy U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

This map illustrates the four major migration flyways of North America; developers are hard-pressed to site wind projects in areas with little effect on birds.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) estimates that 440,000 birds are killed in collisions with wind turbines each year; without stronger regulation, says the American Bird Conservancy (ABC), the annual toll will exceed one million by 2030. To address this issue, the U.S. Department of the Interior has released voluntary guidelines to help developers minimize the impact of wind energy projects on bird habitat and migration. Developed over five years with an advisory committee that included government agencies, the wind energy industry, and some conservation organizations, the guidelines are intended to ensure compliance with federal laws such as the Endangered Species Act—although the rules allowing them to do so are controversial.

Source: ‘Mixed News For Birds, Wind Farms and Buildings’ by Erin Weaver /GreenSource/April 30 2012

*

The modern wind industry really began in the early1980s. According to The Economist: ‘Even though the technology was in its early stages, California installed more than 1.2GW of wind power, then almost 90% of global capacity, in the first half of the 1980s—an era that has come to be known as the great “wind rush”. The rush was driven by a combination of federal tax credits and generous state incentives for wind power. Previously, wind turbines had been installed as single machines or in small clusters. But during the boom, turbines began to be installed in large arrays, or “wind farms”.’

 

http://xaharts.org/Whirlwheel_dir/livermore/livermore.jpg

Panorama. Photo by Steve Deutsch, 2003. Source:http://xaharts.org/Whirlwheel_dir/livermore.html

The most notorious of these was at Altamont Pass north of San Francisco – notorious because it became a graveyard for birds.

The Altamont Pass wind farm, one of the earliest built in the US – the first rotors were installed in 1981 -  is still the largest concentration of wind turbines in the world, composed of 5,200 small wind turbines of various types, sited in a 62 sq ml area of land, operated by some dozen companies.  When construction started no thought had been given to its effect on wildlife, particularly birds.

More than 4,700 birds are killed here each year, including 1300 birds of prey –rare burrowing owls, red-tailed hawks and golden eagles. In fact Altamont Pass is the world’s densest nesting area for golden eagles, a federally protected species. Seventy to eighty eagles are killed each year by the wind turbines. 

According to Popular Mechanics (2007): "A lot of adults come here looking for territory," says ecologist Shawn Smallwood, who has studied the pass extensively, "and very few make it out." By checking 600 of these turbines every day (and many more on other companies’ sites), Smallwood was able to identify the deadliest offenders.’

This excellent video (from 2007) ‘Fatal Attraction: Birds and Wind Turbines’ tells the story.of Altamont Pass and the battle to get the companies involved to replace dangerous turbines. Some progress has been made.

According to Wikipedia: ‘As of 2010, a settlement has been reached between the Audubon Society, Californians for Renewable Energy and NextEra Energy Resources (who operate some 5,000 turbines in the area). Nearly half of the smaller turbines will be replaced by newer, more bird-friendly models. The project is expected to be complete by 2015 and includes $2.5 million for raptor habitat restoration.’

 

*

In  Common concerns about Wind Power  a 2012 report from the Centre of Sustainable Energy in Bristol, it says that ‘these unfortunate events form the basis of the misconception that new wind farms will cause dis-proportionate harm to bird populations.’

It also says that ‘Considerable variation exists in the number of birds killed annually across different wind farms worldwide’ although no data is given.

Also that ‘the industry now undertakes extensive surveying of avian populations and migratory routes to further minimise any detrimental effects before commercial turbines are sited.

‘Modern, large-scale megawatt turbines in use for the past
ten years have been found to result in a significantly lower
rate of fatalities in most areas where they have been
subsequently introduced.’

[On this last point: At Altamont Pass, for example, 250 of the smaller turbines were replaced with 80 new ones, twice as tall, producing comparable power. The new height has helped cut eagle deaths but increased red-tailed hawk deaths which fly at a higher altitude).

*

It is certainly true that, at present, the number of bird deaths caused by wind turbines are much lower than other causes of bird mortality – two of which we have looked at in the Previous Posts. 

But according to  Meera Subramanian in an article The Trouble With Turbines: An Ill Wind [Nature/June 2012]. turbines disproportionally ‘ threaten species that are already struggling, such as bats, which in North America have been hit hard by white-nose fungus…. and raptors, which are slow to reproduce and favour the wind corridors that energy companies covet.

“There are species of birds that are getting killed by wind turbines that do not get killed by autos, windows or buildings,” says Shawn Smallwood,

‘Other species at risk include the critically endangered California condors (Gymnogyps californicus) — which number only 226 in the wild — and the few hundred remaining whooping cranes (Grus americanus), concentrated in the central United States.

‘Biologists can't say whether the increase in wind farms will cause the collapse of these or other bird species, which already face many threats. But waiting for an answer is not an option, says Smallwood. “By the time we do understand the population-level impacts, we might be in a place we don't want to be.”

*

Above picture courtesy of the Colectivo Ornitológico Cigüeña Negra (COCN), Cadiz. Source Save The Eagles International

Subramanian also reports that the Spanish Ornithological Society in Madrid estimates that Spain's 18,000 wind turbines may be killing 6 million to 18 million birds and bats annually. [Figures announced at the First Scientific Congress on Wind Energy and Wildlife Conservation in Jerez de la Frontera, [12th Jan 2012]

Griffon vultures and other raptors flying across the Strait of Gibraltar have to negotiate 13 wind farms in Cadiz province. US biologist Marc Bechard was hired to help solve the problems.

‘The early signs’, writes Subramanian ‘are that with targeted efforts, wind power and wildlife can cautiously coexist. Bechard and his colleagues, for example, lowered mortality at the Cádiz wind farms by 50%, with only a 0.07% loss in energy production Others are finding that minor changes in the design or operation of wind farms can bring major reductions in animal deaths.’

See Video; ‘Strait of Gibraltar: over 100 Griffon vultures die yearly’

*

SCOTLAND

image

 

‘Bird Sensitivity Map to provide locational guidance for onshore wind farms in Scotland’. RSPB Report:June 2006

In 2008, the Scottish government rejected plans for a 181 turbine wind farm on Lewis in the Outer Hebrides on the grounds that it ‘would have had "significant adverse impacts" on rare and endangered birds living on the peatlands – a breach of European habitats legislation.’

RSPB

Building the turbines and the power distribution infrastructure may be a greater problem for many bird species due to disruption or loss of habitat, according to scientists with the British Trust for Ornithology (BTO) and the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) in the UK. Their findings were published in the Journal of Applied Ecology.’ and published on the BBC News website (12th April 2012 under the heading: ‘Wind Farms: ‘Not Major Bird Mincers’.

UPDATE: The Generalist spoke with Graham Meade, one of the RSBP press officers today about wind farms and other bird collision issues. He told me the RSPB are pro renewable energy (they are having a wind turbine installed to power their HQ) but they do watch and assess proposed wind energy projects carefully to determine the potential impact of the development on bird populations and their habitat.

He estimates that they oppose some 6% of the plans. He said they now discuss issues with wind developers at a much earlier stage in the planning process. In fact, when I spoke to him, he was at a conference where they had just been looking at satellite images showing the migration of gannets in connection with a discussion about the siting of wind farms in the North Sea.

*

NORWAY
The dead adult female on this picture was No. 7 killed in the Smøla wind-farm. Photo © Espen Lie Dahl. Source: www.vulkaner.no/n/birds/eagle/hav.html

SMOLA WIND FARM/WHITE-TAILED EAGLES

* The wind farm on the Smola islands off the Norwegian coast in Norway consist of 68 wind turbine making it one of the largest wind projects in Europe.

On the 23rd June 2006, the BBC reported that, according to the RSPB, nine white-tailed eagles have been killed on the Smola islands off the Norwegian coast in 10 months, including all of last year's chicks. Chick numbers at the species' former stronghold have plummeted since the wind farm was built, with breeding pairs at the site down from 19 to one.

White-Tailed Eagles are Europe's largest bird of prey. The Smola islands were designated an Important Bird Area by Birdlife International in 1989 because it had one of the highest densities of white-tailed eagles in the world.

The BBC story says that: ‘Norwegian Institute for Nature Research has launched a four-year study at the site to assess the impact of the turbines on various species of birds and the ability of white tailed eagles to adapt to them. Meanwhile, Statkraft, which operates the Smola site, says it is doing everything it can to find a solution to the problem.’

In a 2011 interview with Norwegian ornithologist Alv Ottar Folkestad on the European Raptors Biology and Cionservation website.

Markus Jais: What other threats to White-tailed Eagles do exist in Norway?


Alv Ottar Folkestad: …what to me is a really scaring prospective is the way wind power development has been introduced in this country. The first wind power plant of significant size in Norway, on Smøla, is localized into the most spectacular performance of nesting concentration of White-tailed Eagles ever known. There are plans for making wind power into huge dimensions, and most of them localized in the most pristine coastal landscape of the most important areas of the White-tailed Eagle. During the last five and a half years, the wind power plant on Smøla has been killing 40 white-tailed eagles, 27 of them adult or sub adult birds, and 11 of them during 2010. There are no mitigating measures taken so far, and hardly any to think of, and there is no indication of adaptation among the eagles to such constructions.’

Statkraft claim that the number of birds and the breeding rates on the Smola islands are increasing. See: Sea eagle research at Smøla wind farm (17-6-2010)’

‘Last year, the population was estimated at 65 to 70 pairs, as well as some individual birds, or about 150 sea eagles in total.

“The Smøla sea eagle population has grown steadily since 1997. Last summer, we registered activity in 61 sea eagle territories on the main island and adjacent islets. This is the highest number on record. There is very little nesting inside the actual wind farm area, but the sea eagle reproduction on Smøla is generally increasing,” says senior researcher Kjetil Bevanger at the Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA).

*

BULGARIA

Bulgaria: Environment Minister Stops 2 Wind Farm Projects in NE Bulgaria
Bulgaria's Minister of Environment and Water has revoked two environmental impact assessments (EIA) issued by a regional inspectorate in the Black Sea city of Varna for the construction of two large wind farms in Dobrudzha.

The decision issued by Nona Karadzhova was triggered by signals of the environmental organizations Bulgarian Society for the Protection of Birds (BSPB) and the Green Balkans, which warned about the dangers resulting from the positioning of the wind farm propellers on bird migration routes.

The stopped investment projects envisage the construction of 150 wind turbines by the General Toshevo company and 95 other wind turbines by the Smin company.

The facilities were to be built in one of the busiest sections of the Via Pontica migration flyway and were dangerously close to protected areas under Natura 2000, according to the environmentalists.

The land plot borders on the Durankulashko Ezero protected site, a natural landmark of European and global importance.

Representatives of environmental organizations insist that the Director of the Varna Regional Inspectorate for Environment Protection made the decision to approve the construction of the wind parks on the basis of misleadingly presented and falsely interpreted biological and ornithological data.

Experts from the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) and the Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust (WWT) have also opposed the wind park projects.

Source: www.novinite.com/view_news.php?id=141159

*

EGYPT 

Wind Energy: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment for 1,000 MW wind farms

‘Migratory birds on collision course with wind parks’ by Cam McGrath [Egyptian Independent/29th Dec 2011]

‘Egypt hopes to harness the wind to help meet its soaring demand for energy, but plans to build a network of wind farms near Gebel al-Zeit on the Red Sea coast have rankled avian conservationists. They fear wind turbines positioned at this geographical choke point could injure or kill untold numbers of migratory birds.

“It’s unfortunate, but the area in Egypt with the highest wind speed is also a bottleneck in one of the world’s biggest bird migration routes,” says environmental consultant Mindy Baha al-Din. “If they create a ‘great wall’ of wind turbines near Gebel al-Zeit, as they did at Zafarana further north, thousands of birds could be killed every year.”

The proposed site is ‘a major bottleneck for birds migrating between their breeding grounds in Europe and West Asia and wintering areas in East Africa. More than 1.5 million migratory birds, including several globally threatened species, travel through the area every year. Among them are White Storks, European Honey Buzzards, Lesser Kestrels, Steppe Eagles, and the critically endangered Northern Bald Ibis.’

Earlier this year, the paper also reported on a visit to Egypt’s largest wind farm in Zaafarana and Elsewedy Towers, the first wind turbine tower construction site in the Middle East and North Africa. Also on the start of the construction of Africa’s biggest wind farm in northern Kenya on the shores of Lake Turkana.

*

CONDORS

Two different views over the impact of this wind farm on the endangered Californian condor.

The image shows a history of condor sightings in the habitat occupied by the Tehachapi Pass Wind farm in California. Map courtesy Jim Wiegand . Source; The Examiner

California condors, wind farms on collision course          [The Examiner/30 August 2009]

Condors versus Wind Turbines [Infrascape Design/5 Jan 2012]

*